Archive
A national briefing on power, data centers, gas, land, and the policy that decides where large load can be built.
Updated every morning and afternoon. Last updated .
Top signal
About $417 billion in lease and cloud obligations starting 2026 to 2027, with terms up to 20 years, tells us AI tenants are signing for powered shells long before they are built.
The same 500 MW load cut existing rates where the grid had headroom and raised them where it did not, so we treat headroom as the first site screen, not an afterthought.
Two utilities ran near 10% reserves at summer peak against 15% to 16% targets, while one now asks large loads to pay 60% of upgrades up front, which we price into site costs.
Generation equipment is being financed before any power contract is signed, with first power targeted for late 2027, so we treat a delivery slot as the asset that moves a site.
With 2027 largely sold and part of 2028 booked on $220 billion of spend this year, we read demand as running ahead of energized sites, not the reverse.
A $94.4 million, 36-month GPU reservation in a 2 MW powered building shows small, already energized space still wins inference deals while big campuses wait.
After a $1 billion Google fiber deal, a $2 billion AWS framework puts long-haul fiber next to power on our screen for which rural sites can actually connect.
A group that spent six years securing 3.6 GW across 24 sites is now filling them itself, starting at 30 MW, which is the land-and-power-first model we track.
An MoU with no site, size, or date is intent, so we log it as a sovereign AI signal and count no capacity until a campus is named.
A 510 MW private plant depends on a 230-mile pipeline expansion not yet approved and aimed at November 2028, so we date the power to the pipe, not the plant filing.
Thirty turbines at about 70 MW each, grown from a 10-unit order this year, show buyers routing around turbine lead times, though we count no megawatts until sites are named.
About $6.65 million for 37 acres, roughly $180,000 an acre, takes Microsoft past 700 acres in the county, a land price we use as a comp for powered suburban parcels.
A $427 million, 122-acre purchase heading toward housing instead of data centers shows that even in the deepest market, consent now sets land value as much as power does.
A 3-2 vote to ratify a development and tax abatement deal, with a court hearing on Oct. 27, means we hold this deal as contested until the lawsuit is resolved.
Clearing about 815 acres before the environmental review closed has now paused two sites, so we treat early site work ahead of permits as schedule risk, not a head start.
State data center energy bills went from about 70 in 2025 to over 200 this year, and 67% of planned sites are rural, so we watch co-op and public power rules closely.
Top signal
Rystad puts fuel-cell spend for data centers near $30 billion by 2030, from $2.8 billion in 2025, but a 9 GW book includes frameworks, so we count only the 1.2 GW Oracle has contracted.
A new lead for batteries, charging, and solar, at a firm that already set 168 Megapacks at one cluster, is a staffing tell we watch, not new megawatts.
Panelists put gas turbines at a decade or more and transformers at up to three years, so we treat on-site power as booked equipment, not a way around the queue.
Regulators moved the large-load tariff hearing from Nov. 3 to Jan. 12, 2027, so who pays for plants and lines is still open and we will not underwrite a rate outcome.
A $450 million plan for 10,000 km of fiber between India's AI hubs is connectivity, not power, so we still screen those campuses on megawatts before we call them deliverable.
Talks that open at 20 MW and jump toward 100 MW, because power is late elsewhere, are overflow demand, so we still want a power date before we move a site up the list.
Five test clusters aimed at early 2027, on a campus with two live 10 MW halls, are a lab, so we do not add them to leased hyperscale capacity.
We read an 85.69 petaflop system in a 6.3 MW hall inside a former power station as reuse of a powered building, the faster path when new grid is scarce.
We read tools that show where a workload runs, plus a disconnected private cloud, as how buyers split AI between public regions and sites they control.
Silk Cloud's B300s still need permits for a 2027 launch, while Fuse cites 128 GPUs and 700 kW in December, so we score the power date, not the chip announcement.
No items in this edition.
Up to 15 buildings on 890 acres Amazon has not bought, aimed at 2027 to 2029 if approved, is still a plan, so we keep counting only the 1,000-acre campus already underway.
A feasibility look at shut nuclear sites, with nuclear power ruled out, is a screen for grid, water, and land, so we count no megawatts until a campus is filed.
Monday's vote on an indefinite pause would need seven votes and would not stop the approved Trident campus, so we separate that project from land still unfiled.
The township already extended its pause six months past Nov. 20, and Tuesday is only a rules talk, so we still treat new Howell data centers as closed.
A council vote set for Oct. 26 could push a pause that ends Nov. 5 out to Oct. 18, 2027, while two approved projects keep building, so we hold new filings.
A notice of up to $25,000 a day, about $6.1 million across three sites, plus a gas-plant suit a judge allowed to proceed, means we treat permits as schedule, not paperwork.
A half-sample of a 1,000-voter survey finds 63% oppose an AI data center within 10 miles and 13% support one, so we treat nearby consent as a siting screen.
Seventeen stormwater permits are suspended and the automatic filing portal is offline, so we treat a pause as real only once the permit system is actually closed.
Hundreds at the state Capitol asked for a statewide pause before more approvals, which changes no rule, so we will not move a Virginia start date until a bill does.
Corridor Signal newsletter (link pending)